Kumar Abhishek @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41863 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -252 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Kumar Abhishek @ Golu Son of Dinesh Prasad Sinha, R/o MohallaKotha Toli, P.S.- Sasaram (Town), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Bachan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 252 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-392 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is a student of B. Sc. Part-III at Kanpur and his name has been disclosed by co-accused Nandee Singh about his involvement in the aforesaid occurrence. There is no recovery of incriminating articles from possession of the petitioner.

The written report has been filed against unknown. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41863 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 252 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1)bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T