← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/367/2021dismissed

Kamaldeo Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-18Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy,Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.367 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17471 of 2008 ====================================================== Kamaldeo Paswan Son of sri Kapildeo Ram Resident of village- Tarbangla, P.o.- Dehri on Sone, P.s.- Dehri on Sone, District- Rohtash ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department of Bihar, Bishwesaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 3.

The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Bishwesaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 4.

The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Bishwesaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 5.

The Chief Engineer (Mechanical) Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Bishwesaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 6.

The Superintendent Engineer National Highway (Technical) Division, Dehri-on-Sone, Rohtas 7.

The Executive Engineer, National Highway (Technical) Division, Dehri on Sone, Rohtas ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, AC to GA 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 18-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.

Appointments in question were cancelled in 1998. Initially, a direction was given to institute a criminal case, however, thereafter all the appointments were cancelled, which

Patna High Court L.P.A No.367 of 2021(3) dt.18-05-2022 2/2 were done without any advertisement or without the post being sanctioned. Keeping in view, all such illegal appointments were nullified way back in the year 1998. The learned single Judge thus dismissed the writ petition finding no reason to further examine the matter.

We find no infirmity in the impugned order. Accordingly, the Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands also disposed of.

(Rajan Gupta, J) ( Rajiv Roy, J) Anjani/- U