← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/22292/2011dfd for non appearance

Arun Kumar Trivedi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-02-23Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 22292 of 2011 ====================================================== ARUN KUMAR TRIVEDI S/O Sri Sudhakar Chandra Trivedi R/O Village P.O and P.S- Mohiuddin Nagar Bazar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.

2.

The Director, Primary And Elementary Education Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.

3.

The Director Mass Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 5.

District Superintendent Of Education Samastipur. 6.

District Education Officer, Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

N O N E For the Respondent/s :

Mr Anuj Kumar, AC to SC XII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 23-02-2023 This matter has been pending since 14.12.2011. Earlier, it was taken up on two occasions, I e, on 16.12.2011 and 30.08.2012, only to be adjourned.

Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned State Counsel, on the other hand, submits that the issue of all claims under the non-formal scheme has already been concluded by order dated 26.02.2016 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No 32079 of 2015 by the Apex Court which reads as follows:

"We find no infirmity in the order impugned herein. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.22292 of 2011(4) dt.23-02-2023 2/2 The relief granted by the High Court shall be restricted to those who approached the High Court who were heard as well as who wanted to get themselves impleaded and those who have filed applications here at par with those former as well as all those petitioner Instructors which are pending as on date before the Court but shall not apply to any fresh case either here or before the High Court.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of."

In view of the above position, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, without going into the merits of the submission advanced on behalf of the learned State Counsel. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U