← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31956/2024bail granted

Sudama Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-26Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31956 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2023 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sudama Singh S/o Late Dadan Singh R/o Village- Mangalpur, P.S.- Nautan, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 327, 379, 354B and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant with an allegation that on account of dispute relating to land an altercation took place and the petitioner assaulted the informant by rod causing injury on his head. It is further submitted that allegation of snatching golden chain worth Rs.48,000/- from the informant by Madan Singh is ornamental in nature. It is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to land an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31956 of 2024(3) dt.26-06-2024 2/2 It is also submitted that the injury suffered by the informant is simple in nature as would manifest from the injury report annexed as Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence nor the blow was repeated.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 281 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T