Umesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27032 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2023 Thana- NADI P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
UMESH KUMAR Son of Gyanchand Rai Resident of village - Jethuli, P.S. - Nadi, Distt. - Patna 2.
DINESH KUMAR @ DINESH RAY SON OF GYANCHAND RAI Resident of village - Jethuli, P.S. - Nadi, Distt. - Patna 3.
NAGENDRA RAY @ NAGENDRA KUMAR SON OF GENA RAI Resident of village - Jethuli, P.S. - Nadi, Distt. - Patna 4.
MANISH KUMAR SON OF DINESH KUMAR @ DINESH RAY Resident of village - Jethuli, P.S. - Nadi, Distt. - Patna 5.
RAVI KUMAR SON OF DINESH KUMAR @ DINESH RAY Resident of village - Jethuli, P.S. - Nadi, Distt. - Patna 6.
GYANCHAND RAI SON OF LATE RAM KARAN RAY Resident of village - Jethuli, P.S. - Nadi, Distt. - Patna 7.
MUNNA KUAMR SON OF RAMNARESH RAY @ NARESH RAY Resident of village - Jethuli, P.S. - Nadi, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and allegation is of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27032 of 2023(2) dt.16-05-2023 2/2 recovery of 865.59 liters of liquor from a pickup van. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and are not owner of the pickup van and they came to be implicated based on suspicion without any material to connect them with the offence.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nadi P.S. Case No. 97 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T