← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32156/2022disposed

Sanjeet Mahton @ Sanjeet Kumar Mahton v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-16Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32156 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2022 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sanjeet Mahton @ Sanjeet Kumar Mahton Son Of Tun Lal Mahto Resident Of Makkhachak, Ward No. 6, Police Station- Bakhri, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. There is recovery of 765 litres of Indian made Foreign Liquor from a maize field.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot. Nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the seized illicit liquor or the place of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32156 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 2/2 recovery. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner is accused in three other cases, out of which, two cases are of similar nature. Considering the fact that petitioner is accused in three other cases out of which, two cases are of similar nature, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to surrender before learned Court below and pray for regular bail. The learned Court below may consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, keeping in view the facts discussed above and without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T