Jayant Kumar Suman @ Jay Jay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25882 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2025 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Jayant Kumar Suman @ Jay Jay Kumar S/o Ravindra Ray Resident of village- Bhograjpur Telgama, P.s.- Mohanpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 292, 54, 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, police received information about firing between two groups in Bhograjpur Telgama village. With the help of video clips and the statements of villagers, it was found that Sahil Kumar was assaulted by Mithlesh Rai and his son Ravi Prakash Kumar and in retaliation, Sahil Kumar along with his associates in which, this petitioner is also one of the members, made firing. In response, Mithlesh Rai and his associates also made firing from rooftops.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25882 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 Accordingly, the present case has been registered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Further submission is that no person is injured in the alleged occurrence. No cartridge has been recovered by the police from the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics. Except the suspicion, there is nothing material against the petitioner. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent which is not of the similar nature. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and nature of allegation, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shahpur Patori, Samastipur in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 54 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25882 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/-koustav U T