Ramesh Tatma @ Rajesh Tatma v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55918 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3841 Year- 2012 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Ramesh Tatma @ Rajesh Tatma son of Manglu Tatma, Resident of village- Kuari, P.S.- Kursakata, District- Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Pinki Devi wife of Ramesh Tatma, Resident of village- Kuari, P.S.- Kursakata, District- Araria. At present Daughter of Dhaneshwar Tatma, Resident of village- Sukhsaina, P.S.- Tarabari, District- Araria .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Ziaul Quamar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. A. Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner being the husband of the complainant is apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which processes were directed to be issued after cognizance being taken under Section 498A/379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The basic accusation is of torture.

On instruction it is submitted that the petitioner admits his marriage with the complainant and is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55918 of 2015 (2) dt.09-12-2015 2/3 Statement to the aforesaid effect has been made in paragraph no. 9 of the petition which reads as follows: "That the petitioner is husband of the complainant he is ready to keep her wife with all respect and dignity. " Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM Araria in connection with Complaint Case No. 3841C of 2012 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant and on her appearance the petitioner will take the complainant to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour.

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned court below in three eventualities - (i) if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored or (ii) if the complainant fails to appear before the learned court

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55918 of 2015 (2) dt.09-12-2015 3/3 below or (iii) if the complainant deliberately gets reluctant to reconcile the issue.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anil/- U T