Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26062/2026dismissed

Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-06Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26062 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Nitish Kumar S/O Raja Ram Sahni Resident of Village - Gunai Bashi Harpur Bhindi, Ward no.- 03, P.S- Tajpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 09.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 60961 of 2025, which reads as under:

"Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 309(4) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals are said to have snatched the motorcycle of the informant.

4. The petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26062 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 25.05.2025.

5. The name of the petitioner has come in the self inculpatory statement of the coaccused.

6. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed."

4. Considering the nature of allegation and the fact that no fresh ground for grant of bail is made out, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

6. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T