← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22833/2020bail granted

Sonu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-25Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22833 of 2020 Arising Out of Case No.-458 Year-2018 BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== SONU SINGH Son of Shambhu Singh Resident of Village- Mohanpur, P.O. Makaita, P.S.- Dhankund and district Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nitu Singh W/o Sonu Singh, D/o Prahlad Prasad Singh Resident of Salehpur, P.S.- Habibpur and Distt- Bhagalpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madan Mohan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-07-2023 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A)/ 494 of the I.P.C. and u/s 4 of the D.P. Act.

3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22833 of 2020(15) dt.25-07-2023 2/2 husband of the victim and he is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts of the case and nature of accusation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Complaint case No. 458/ 2018, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T