Kaseero v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.1126 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Kaseero ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar and Anr ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar Sinha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-02-2023 This criminal revision application has been filed against order dated 24.09.2016 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kishanganj in Case No. 48 of 2015, Trial No. 82 of 2015 whereby and whereunder, the learned Principal Judge has directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to opposite party No. 2, wife of the petitioner, and Rs. 2,000/- each to opposite party Nos. 3 and 4, minor children of opposite party No. 2, as maintenance.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not in the financial position to pay the maintenance as directed by the Court below. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife i.e., opposite party No. 2 and children, i.e., opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 with full dignity and honour.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1126 of 2016(2) dt.16-02-2023 2/2 I have carefully perused the impugned order. The monthly maintenance allowance of Rs. 3,000/- per month to opposite party No. 2, wife of the petitioner, and Rs. 2,000/- each to opposite party Nos. 3 and 4, minor children of opposite party No. 2, in this age of high inflation cannot be said to be on higher side or excessive. I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order, which requires any interference by this Court.

Accordingly, this criminal revision application stands dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T