Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25495 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-516 Year-2020 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar S/O Late Bharat Rai R/O Village- Madhopur Hazari, P.SSahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Yugal Kishore, Advocate Mrs. Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026 Heard Mr. Yugal Kishore duly assisted by Mrs. Rupa Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 516 of 2020 instituted under Sections 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later section 411 of the IPC was added lodged on 02.10.2020 by the informant, Ramsabd Singh.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he is working as Senior Highway Engineer and alleged that on 02.10.2020, a truck loaded with iron rod,guarder, channel etc. were loaded on a truck by the named accused and when they reached the place, the accused escaped which followed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25495 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 FIR.
4. Though, the learned counsel for the petitioner tried to show innocence submitting that he is neither of the owner nor the driver of the truck nor anything incriminating recovered from his conscious possession, learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that the matter is of the year 2020, he has four criminal antecedent and two of which is under section 379 beside one case under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
5. Considering the submissions aforesaid as also the criminal antecedent coupled with the fact that after six years he has moved before the Courts for anticipatory bail, no relief can be extended.
6. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T