Md. Mustafa Ansari And Mustafa Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44259 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -MAJHAULIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Md. Mustafa Ansari @ Mustafa Ansari S/o Late Hadish Ansari All Resident of Village-Bhatwalia, P.O.-Jaukatia P.S. - Majhaulia, DistrictWest Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-11-2016 Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner , Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque, learned Additional Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Satyapal Singh, learned counsel who has voluntarily appeared on behalf the of informant. The sole petitioner , apprehending his arrest in Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016 registered for the offence under Section 498A , 302, 201 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been made accused only because of the fact that petitioner was Nandoi of the husband of the deceased. He submits that petitioner is teacher in Government School and he

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44259 of 2016 (4) dt.22-11-2016 2/2 has been made accused only due to the reason that he was doing pairvi in the case . On aforesaid ground a prayer has been for grant of anticipatory bail. Earlier in this case, case diary was called for which has been received.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor by way of referring to statement made in paragraph no. 15, 16, 176 of the case diary submits that there is material against the petitioner showing involvement in the present case.

Besides hearing I have perused the material available on record.

In view of the facts and circumstances I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed. Accordingly order dated 6.10.2016 whereby direction was given not to take coercive steps against the petitioner stands automatically vacated. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T