Laxman Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21593 of 2011 ====================================================== LAXMAN RAM S/O Late Kailash Ram Resident Of Village and Post Bhandar, P.S- Bisrampur, District- Palamu State Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Co- Operative Societies, Co- Operative Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Bihar State Co- Operative Land Development Bank Ltd., through its Chairman-Cum- Appellate Authority, Budha Marg, Patna. 3.

The Chairman-Cum-Appellate Authority, the Bihar State Co-Operative Land Development Bank Ltd. Budh Marg, Patna.

4.

The Managing Director, The Bihar State Co-Operative Land Development Bank Ltd. Budh Marg, Patna.

5.

Mishilesh Kumar Singh, the Director Personnel State Co-Oprative Land Developement Bank, Budha Marg, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, Advocate For the Respondent Bank:

Mr. Rajesh Prasad Choudhary, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ajay, G.A.-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This writ application has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning applications of Bihar State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Land Development Bank has submitted that this writ application cannot be maintained in view of Special Bench decision of this Court in case of The Organizer, Dehri C.D. & C.M. Union Limited Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2014 (1)

Patna High Court CWJC No.21593 of 2011(4) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 PLJR 695.

4. I find force in submission made on behalf of the respondents.

5. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as not maintainable.

6. The petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to avail any alternative remedy before the appropriate forum against the actions of the Bank which are impugned. If any question of limitation arises, the appropriate forum shall keep in mind the fact that the petitioner has been pursuing his remedy before this Court by filing present writ application, while considering petitioner's application for condonation of delay. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) S.Ali/- U