Jeetendra Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26924 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -454 Year- 2015 Thana -WAJIRGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Jeetendra Yadav, son of Anirudh Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyavarat Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-09-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State.
The petitioner being the husband of the informant is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/498A/494/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Basic accusation is of torture for non-fulfillment of dowry demand and performing second marriage.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner admits his marriage with the informant and he is ready to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. A statement to that effect has been made in paragraph no.6 of the petition, which reads as under :- "That so far the petitioner most humbly and most
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26924 of 2016 (2) dt.26-09-2016 2/2 respectfully submits that he is still ready to keep his wife i.e. informant to his house with full honour and dignity without any conditions and also without any grievance.".
Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner has performed second marriage.
The factum of second marriage has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Under the circumstances, let the learned Court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of six weeks in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No.454/2015, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U T