← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/469/2019dismissed

Ratni Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-10Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.469 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18285 of 2016 ====================================================== Ratni Devi W/o Jagdish Sahu Resident of Hajipur, Ward No. 17, Khagaria, P.O. District-Khagaria ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate Khagaria 3.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Department, Khagaria (D.C.L.R.) 4.

The Circle Officer Khagaria ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Shekhar Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashif Kalim ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) Date : 10-11-2022 Heard Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Ashif Kalim for the State. The appellant stands aggrieved by the order passed by the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Khagaria in Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 1/1987-88 which was passed on 02.08.1988.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.469 of 2019 dt.10-11-2022 2/3 The case of the appellant that he was never noticed before the cancellation of Jamabandi was repelled by the learned Single Judge on the sole ground that an order passed in the 1988 was sought to be challenged in the year 2016. The contention of the appellant before the learned Single Judge that he had come to know about the order only in the year 2014 was not believed for the reason that the appellant was found to have obtained the certified copy of the order on 12.08.1988.

Apart from this, after having gone thorough the order dated 02.08.1988, it appears that the Ex-Jamindar had wrongly settled the land in favour of some persons, who ultimately had settled it in favour of the appellant. The land has been shown in the revenue record as a public land which could not have been settled by any person.

For these reasons viz. an inordinate delay in approaching this Court and the explanation offered by the petitioner for explaining such delay having been rejected and there being no right of Ex-Jamindar to ever settle the government land in favour of any person, we are not inclined

Patna High Court L.P.A No.469 of 2019 dt.10-11-2022 3/3 to interfere with the order by which the appellant has been non-suited on the ground of delay.

The appeal is dismissed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) ( Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 14.11.2022 Transmission Date