Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23726 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2019 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Sunil Kumar (Male) aged about 35 years, Son of late Binda Prasad 2.

Deepak Kumar (Male) aged about 18 years Son of Sunil Kumar Both are residents of Village-Jamo Bazar, P.S.- Jamo Bazar, District Siwan. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 16-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 504 and 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusation of assaults by both the petitioners is not supported by the injury report and the injury sustained by the informant's husband in any way is simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let them be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIII, Siwan in connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23726 of 2019(2) dt.16-04-2019 2/2 down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and with further conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T