Shree Bhagwan Pandey And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6120 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Shree Bhagwan Pandey Son of Late Dhanusdhari Pandey
2. Manish Kumar Son of Shree Bhagwan Pandey
3. Rajnish Pandey Son Of Shree Bhagwan Pandey All Are Resident Of Mohalla- New Gangauly Dihri Dalmiya Nagar, P.S.- Dihri Dalmiya Nagar, District- Rohtas (Sasaram) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna
2. Shivajee Pandey Son of Late Dhanushdhari Pandey
3. Umesh Kumar Pandey Son of Late Dhanushdhari Pandey
4. Chandrashekhar Pandey Son of Late Dhanushdhari Pandey
5. Hansdeo Pandey Son of Late Dhanushdhari Pandey
6. Rama Shankar Pandey Son Of Late Dhanushdhari Pandey Respondent No. 2 to 6 All Are Resident Of New Gangauly Dihri Dalmiya Nagar, P.S.- Dihri Dalmiya Nagar, District- Rohtas (Sasaram)
7. Baldeo Singh Son Of Late Bhola Singh Resident Of Village- Gyani Bigha, Gotpa, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas
8. Lalan Prasad Singh Son of Baldeo Singh
9. Baban Singh Son of Baldeo Singh
10. Raman Prasad Singh Son of Baldeo Singh
11. Dadan Kumar Singh Son Of Baldeo Singh Respondent No. 7 to 11 All Are Resident Of Village- Gyani Bigha, Gotpa, P.S. - Agrer, District- Rohtas .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the State : Mr. Neeraj Raj, AC to G.A.8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 06-10-2016 In spite of repeated calls nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ application.
The counsel for the State is present.
The writ petitioners pray, inter alia, for providing them protection in maintaining the property as also a writ in the nature of certiorari to declare the sale deed executed by the respondents
Patna High Court CWJC No.6120 of 2014 (15) dt.06-10-2016 2/2 in favour of the private respondent ab initio null and void. As none appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ application, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U