Annu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46563 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2017 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Annu Kumar, Son of Late Gopal Rai, R/o Village- Sherpur, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-399, 402/414 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(i-b)A/26/35 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. There is no recovery from possession of the petitioner. As per written report, three persons were apprehended by police and out of them, one Saurav Kumar disclosed the name of this petitioner.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46563 of 2017 (4) dt.02-11-2017 2/2 sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T