Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6064 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -351 Year- 2017 Thana -PATNA CITY CHOWK District- PATNA ====================================================== Suraj Kumar, Son of Shri Anil Prasad, resident of Mohalla Humadi Gali, P.S. Chowk, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Chowk P.S. Case No. 351 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that two Tempos were recovered from possession of Vikash Kumar who could not produce valid papers of the vehicles in question. The name of this petitioner has been disclosed by the co-accused Vikash Kumar during investigation.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6064 of 2018 (3) dt.19-02-2018 2/2 351 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Patna City, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T