Janardan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7090 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.
Janardan Prasad Singh Son of Late Dashrath Prasad Singh Resident of village- Gangasarai, Police Station- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. 2.
Arbind Singh Son of Late Tripit Narayan Singh Resident of villageGangasarai, Police Station- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. 3.
Shankar Kumar Singh Son of Late Aditya Narayan Singh Resident of village- Gangasarai, Police Station- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. 4.
Anil Singh Son of Late Chandradeo Singh Resident of village- Gangasarai, Police Station- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. 5.
Santosh Kumar Singh Son of Late Binod Kumar Singh Resident of villageGangasarai, Police Station- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. 6.
Dhananjay Singh @ Dhananjay Kumar Son of Satya Narayan Singh Resident of village- Gangasarai, Police Station- Barahiya, DistrictLakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The District Magistrate Lakhisarai.
3.
The Circle officer Barahiya, Lakhisarai.
4.
The Block Development Officer Barahiya, Lakhisarai. 5.
The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Gangasarai, Police Station- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sajid Salim Khan (Sc25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-01-2024 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdrawn this writ petition in view of the statement made in paragraph No. 13 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 which reads as follows:
Patna High Court CWJC No.7090 of 2023(4) dt.09-01-2024 2/2 "13. That the statements made in Para-9 of writ petition is not correct hence denied. Neither there is any proposal to construct the Government building over the land in proceeding nor to construct Mahadalit Samudayik Bhawan over the land in proceeding. It is reported by Halka Karamchari that the land in question consists a playground for the public in general."
2. Permission granted.
3. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U