Kailash Prasad Gupta And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23277 of 2011 ====================================================== 1.
KAILASH PRASAD GUPTA Son Of Late Dhanu Lal Gupta Resident Of Village and P.S. Pipra Bazar, Dist- Supaul 2.
Jitan Thakur Son Of Late Rameshwar Thakur Resident Of Village - Satar Kataiya, P.S. Bihra, Dist - Saharsa 3.
Baleshwar Mallik Son Of Late Nebi Mallik Resident Of Village - Sukhpur, P.S. and Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary, Samanya Prashashan Department, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 3.
The Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 4.
The Agriculture Production Commissioner, Department Of Agriculture , New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 5.
The Joint Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 6.
The Administrator, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (Abolished) Pant Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna 7.
The Secretary, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (Abolished) Pant Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna 8.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Supaul Cum Special Officer, Agriculture Produce Market Committee (Dissolved) , Supaul, District-Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jai Prakash Verma, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Madhav Pd. Yadav, G.P.-23 : Ms. Meera Singh, A.C. to G.P.-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-10-2023 Heard Mr. Jai Prakash Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. In view of the judgment reported in 2014 (2) PLJR 168 (SC) Nand Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors, learned
Patna High Court CWJC No.23277 of 2011(3) dt.31-10-2023 2/2 counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U