Sanyog Kumar @ Sanjog Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29582 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2022 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== SANYOG KUMAR @ SANJOG KUMAR S/O RAM JATAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE- ALAM BIGHA, P.S- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Belaganj P.S. Case No.33 of 2022 for the alleged offences under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. This is the second attempt of the petitioner before this Court for grant of bail. By a detailed order dated 03.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.26346 of 2023, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court.
3. Vide order dated 04.10.2024, a report was called for from the learned Court below regarding the stage of the trial and the time likely to be taken in conclusion of the trial. In compliance thereof, a report dated 22.10.2024 has been sent by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-V, Gaya,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29582 of 2024(5) dt.22-11-2024 2/2 which is at Flag 'R' to this application. In his report, the learned Judge has, inter alia, stated that out of nine charge-sheet witnesses, one witness has been examined. It is further reported that nine months time is likely to be taken in conclusion of the trial.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the report of the learned Judge, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby once again rejected.
5. The learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of nine months.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T