← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25789/2025bail granted

Bikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Prasad @ Kalu Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-25Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25789 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2024 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== Bikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Prasad @ Kalu Prasad Son of Bam Bahadur Prasad Resident of Village - Bishunpura Kala, Police Station - Ekma, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mili Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Ekma P.S. Case No. 258 of 2024, registered under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons assaulted the son of the informant by means of iron rod and tangi due to which he sustained head injury and also snatched his gold chain.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that no specific allegation of assault has been attributed against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25789 of 2025(2) dt.25-04-2025 2/2 petitioner. He further submits that as per allegation, the specific allegation against the petitioner and co-accused Bambahadur is of assaulting Pradeep Kumar with Tangi and Iron rod but, from the perusal of the injury report, it appears that the injury is simiple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 258 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T