Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27487/2022dismissed

Arvind Sahni Alias Arbind Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-02Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27487 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2015 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Arvind Sahni Alias Arbind Sahni Son of Late Bharat Sahni Resident of Village - Kaithma, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 02-11-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The present petition is by way of fourth attempt at the behest of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Begusarai Muffasil PS case no. 71 of 2015 under Sections 302 and other allied sections of of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, inasmuch as this Court has dismissed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail on the earlier three occasions.

The petitioner is alleged to have fired gun shots on the deceased, resulting in his death.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 15.05.2018,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27487 of 2022(3) dt.02-11-2022 2/2 however, there is no progress, whatsoever in the on-going trial, hence the petitioner should be granted the privilege of bail. Per contra, the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner does not deserve leniency in view of the grievousness of the offence alleged to have been committed by him.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I find that there is no change in circumstance, from the day the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail was rejected earlier, till date, hence I do not find any reason to re-consider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail, especially in view of the heinous crime of murder, alleged to have been committed by the petitioner, thus the present petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T