Murshid Mian And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57061 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2015 Thana -SIMULTALA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Murshid Mian

2. Kamrul Mian Both sons of Sahid Mian, R/o Village- Kanodi, P.S.- Bhairoganj, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajnish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chandra Prasad(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Simultalla Police Station Case No. 19 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 302, 201, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the gravity of the offences, in view of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Jai Prakash Singh v. State of Bihar and Another, reported in (2012) 4 SCC 379, I am not inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of anticipatory bail.

This application for anticipatory bail, is hereby, rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57061 of 2015 (2) dt.29-02-2016 2/2 The petitioners, namely, Murshid Mian and Kamrul Mian, are directed to surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If they do so, their application for regular bail shall be considered by the learned Court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √