Rahmat Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28625 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2021 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
RAHMAT ANSARI SON OF LATE ISLAM ANSARI 2.
REJAULLAH @ REJAULLAH ANSARI SON OF RAHMAT ANSARI 3.
AMJAT ANSARI @ AMJAD ANSARI SON OF BADRUDDIN ANSARI All RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MAHDEOPATTI , P.S- PARIHAR , DIST- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hans Lal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Rina Sinha, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.
The informant alleges that Murtaza Khan @ Laloo Ansari on pretext of marriage was establishing physical relation for the last one year with her and when she asked him to marry he refused. Further, his parents refused from marriage and even abused and assaulted the informant's family members.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28625 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the informant at the outset submits that he does not oppose the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners as the case has been compromised between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners on merit submits that whatever allegation is alleged the same is against Murtaza Khan @ Laloo Ansari and petitioners being family members of Murtaza Khan @ Laloo Ansari have been falsely implicated.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 221 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T