Patna High CourtMJC/1514/2014dismissed

Ashok Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-20Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1514 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1617 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Ashok Kumar Singh Son of Late Ramashraya Prasad Singh ( Govt. Contractor and General Order Supplier) R/o of Manikpur HouseImalichatti, P.S- Brahampura, District- Muzaffarpur, Permanent AddressVillage Manikpur, P.O+ P.S- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Chanchal Kumar, the Secretary, Bhawan Nirman Bibhag, Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Gopal Krishna, the Engineer in- Chief, Bhawan Nirman Bibhag, Bihar, Patna

4. Sri Ramesh Kumar, the Chief Engineer, North Wing, Bhawan Nirman Bibhag, Bihar, Patna

5. Sri Awdhesh Prasad, the Superintending Engineer, North Bihar Circle, Building Construction Department, Muzaffarpur

6. Sri Awdhesh Mandal, the Executive Engineer, Building Division, Muzaffarpur

7. M/s Nagendra Mishra of Village- Barwraj, P.S- Barwraj, DistrictMuzaffarpur .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Kailash Nath Diwakar, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambastha, G.P. 14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2016 No one appears for the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State files the show cause on behalf of opposite party no. 6, the Executive Engineer, Building Division, Muzaffarpur.

The direction of this Court in the order under contempt was to the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, to consider and dispose of the representation dated 05.12.2011. In the show cause filed an order dated 13.03.2012, passed by the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, has been brought on the record in which the representation of the petitioner has been considered and it has

Patna High Court MJC No.1514 of 2014 (2) dt.20-09-2016 been rejected.

In the circumstances, the order under contempt stands complied with.

The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) SA/- U √ T √