← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25078/2025bail granted

Md. Kaishar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-01Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25078 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2024 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Kaishar S/o- Eklakh Village- Bochgawn Ward no 6 PS- Jalalgarh District-Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bidhu Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 185/2024 dated 13.05.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants ridden on the two motorcycles are alleged to have looted Rs. 1,36,450/-, Aadhar Card, PAN Card, driving license and educational certificates on the point of pistol.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25078 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2025 2/2 this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Md. Kadir @ Kadir, who has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 24.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc No. 1570 of 2025. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 07.01.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Purnea in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 185/2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T