Rajendra Rai @ Rajendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27768 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2024 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rajendra Rai @ Rajendra Ray S/o Late Bhadai Rai @ Late Bhadai Ray R/o Village- Chiraiyatok, Ward no 12, PS- Bachhwara, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109, 303(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is aged about 70 years and the informant alleges that on the order of the petitioner, the accused persons assaulted him but he managed to escape and reached home but petitioner came after him and assaulted him by an iron khanti causing injury on head and Pappu Rai snatched his golden chain.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that a person who has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27768 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 remained a person with clean antecedent all throughout his life all of a sudden has been made a criminal with an allegation that he assaulted the informant by an iron khanti. It is next submitted that the injuries suffered by the informant is simple in nature. It is thus submitted that informant got assaulted somewhere else and took the same as an opportunity to implicate the petitioner in the instant case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 314 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T