Patna High CourtCWJC/12316/2007dismissed

Ram Sakal Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-22Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12316 of 2007 ====================================================== Ram Sakal Singh, son of Late Ram Jhalak Singh, resident of village Kodia, Post Office - Dauda, Via + P.S. Bihta, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Joint Commissioner, accounts Administration, Provident Fund Directorate, Department of Finance, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Sekhpura, Patna.

4. The Superintending Engineer, Patna Division, Patna.

5. The Accounts Officer-cum-District Provident Fund Officer, Godda. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Sinha Mr. Sushil Kumar For the Respondent/s : AC to AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4.

22-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General - 6.

The petitioner, who admittedly retired w.e.f.

31-05-1997 by filing the present writ petition in the month of September, 2007 i.e. after more than ten years of his retirement, has prayed to direct the respondents to grant first time bound promotion and re-fix his pension.

On record, there is only one representation filed by the petitioner, which too appears to have been filed by the petitioner on 15-08-2007.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on an order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 2070 of 2002 disposed

Patna High Court CWJC No.12316 of 2007 (4) dt.22-04-2015 2/2 of on 16-12-2004 and submits that in identical situation the writ petition of other person was allowed and as such, the petitioner deserves the same relief.

The Court is of the opinion that since the petitioner slumbered over the matter for about ten years, it would not be appropriate for this Court to interfere with the matter. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U