Rana Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21441 of 2013 ====================================================== 1.
Rana Kumar and Ors Son Of Shri Balbhadra Yadav Resident Of Village - Garhiya, P.O. - Balam, P.S. and District - Madhepura 2.
Sanjiv Kumar Son Of Shri Lagan Yadav Resident Of Village - Garhiya, P.O. - Balam, P.S. and District - Madhepura 3.
Shiv Kumar Ram Son Of Shri Kailash Ram Resident Of Village - Garhiya, P.O. - Balam, P.S. and District - Madhepura 4.
Sajjan Kumar Son Of Gango Yadav Resident Of Village - Garhiya, P.O. - Balam, P.S. and District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Deputy Inspector General, Human Rights Bihar, Patna 3.
The Inspector General Bihar Military Police, Bihar, Patna 4.
The Chairman. Central Recuritment Board Cum Addl. Inspector General, S.C.R.B., Bihar, Patna 5.
The Chairman , District Selection Board, Madhepura 6.
The Chairman, District Selection Board, Saharsa 7.
The Chairman, District Selection Board, Supaul 8.
The Chairman, District Selection Board, Munger 9.
The Chairman, District Selection Board, Begusarai 10.
The Chairman, District Selection Board, Samastipur 11.
The Chairman, District Selection Board, Katihar 12.
The Chairman, District Selection Board, Bhagalpur 13.
The Chairman, Selection Board Bmp 8, Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Ajay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-01-2023 Heard the parties.
The matter relates to selection and appointment
Patna High Court CWJC No.21441 of 2013(2) dt.25-01-2023 2/2 conducted under the Advertisement of 2004 for the post of Constables. The petitioners claim right of appointments against the left over vacancies under the said advertisement. After almost 18 years, no such relief can be granted to the petitioners, as the selection process can not be continued for such a long period. The writ petition by efflux of time has become infructuous.
This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Brajesh Kumar/- Item no.13 U