Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28293/2025bail granted

Shobhit Kumar Yadav @ Shobhit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-13Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28293 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2024 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== Shobhit Kumar Yadav @ Shobhit Kumar son of Bhola Yadav Resident of village -Mohanpur PS- Pandaul District -Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 252 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 2586 of 2024 dated 12.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 309(6) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants ridden on two motorcycles stopped the motorcycle of the informant and snatched his shoulder bag containing Rs. 40,000/-. They pushed down the informant and shot at him at his left thigh. They also took away motorcycle, shoulder bag and mobile phone of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28293 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused Saurabh Yadav. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 252 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 2586 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T