Om Prakash Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.316 of 2014 ====================================================== Om Prakash Das son of Dodrah lal, resident of village-Chhihattar, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna
3. The Superintendent of Police, Patna
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Danapur, Patna
5. The Officer-in-charge, S.C./S.T./ Minority Police Station, Patna
6. The Officer-in-charge, Maner Police Station, Patna
7. Ramakant Singh son of Late Shicharan Singh, resident of villageChhihattar, P.S.-Maner, District- Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sushant Praveen, A.C. to S.C.-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2015 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. Let the same be kept on record.
This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner for directing the respondent concerned to lodge an FIR on the basis of the written report submitted by the petitioner to the Officer-incharge of Maner police station dated 21st April, 2013. It has been contended on behalf of the State that on 19.2.2015, on the basis of fardbeyan of the petitioner, Maner P.S. Case No.60 of 2015 has already been registered under sections 341, 323, 334, 379, 353, 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Indian
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.316 of 2014 (3) dt.27-02-2015 2/2 Penal Code and section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It has also been stated in the counter affidavit that for the delay in institution of the FIR, the Sub Divisional Police Officer vide letter no.529 dated 18.2.2015 has recommended for disciplinary proceeding against the Officer-in-charge concerned.
In view of the fact that the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, the application is disposed of. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- U T