Kismatiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47930 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2016 Thana -PAKARIBARAW District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Kismatiya Devi W/o Kanhai Chauhan, R/o Village- Barki Marhal, P.S.- Pakaribarawan, District- Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 58 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. The police after investigation has submitted final form against her but cognizance has been taken against this petitioner also along with other accused by the court below.
From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47930 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 58 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T