← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (DB)/369/2022dismiss for nonprosecution

Rajiv Ranjan Singh @ Chunnu Singh @ Rajiv Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-20Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.369 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2018 Thana- NIA District- Patna ====================================================== Rajiv Ranjan Singh @ Chunnu Singh @ Rajiv Kumar, Son of Mithilesh Prasad Singh, permanently resident of Village - Tetar, P.S. - Atri, District - Gaya, Bihar. Presently at Flat No. 202, Gharana Apartment, P.S. - Rampur, District - Gaya, Bihar.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Union of India through the Director General, N.I.A., C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

None For the N.I.A.

:

Dr. K.N. Singh, Addl. Solicitor General Mr. Arvind Kumar, Spl. P.P.

For the State :

Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 20-08-2025 This is the third occasion when the matter has come up on the list only for the reason that learned counsel for the appellant has not removed the defects as pointed out by the office.

2. Adjournments have been granted in the matter on 08.07.2022, 18.04.2023 and lastly on 24.07.2025.

3. On the last date, i.e., 24.07.2025 as well as today,

Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.369 of 2022(5) dt.20-08-2025 2/2 no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant.

4. In these circumstances, we find no reason to keep on adjourning the matter for removal of the defects.

5. This appeal is dismissed in want of prosecution. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) (Sourendra Pandey, J) Praveen-II/- U T