Dayanand Chaudhary @ Dayanand And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40315 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -435 Year- 2014 Thana -SIWAN MUFFASIL District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Dayanand Chaudhary @ Dayanand S/o Late Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary

2. Sandip Yadav @ Sandeep Kr. Chaudhary son of Dayanand Chaudhary @ Dayanand

3. Sweta Kumari daughter of Dayanand Chaudhary @ Dayanand

4. Lalmani Devi @ Lalmani Devi wife of Late Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary.

5. Binda Devi wife of Dayanand Chaudhary @ Dayanand All Resident of Village- Ropanchak, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj.

6. Punam Devi, wife of Shyam Bahadur Yadav @ Shyam Bahadur Prasad, D/o Late Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Ramapali, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, District- Siwan.

7. Neelam Devi @ Neelam Kumari wife of Anil Yadav, R/o VillageHarkhauli, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Anita Kumari wife of Jay Prakash Chaudhary @ Pawan Chaudhary, D/o Jaleshwar Yadav, At Present Resident of Mohalla- Ayodhyapuri, Lane No- 2, House no. D/5, Srinagar, Siwan, Police Station- Siwan Muffasil, District- Siwan.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-03-2018 This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the order dated 04.08.2015 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Trial No. 3423 of 2017 arising out of Siwan (Muffasil) P.S.Case No. 435 of 2014 whereby cognizance has been taken against them for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40315 of 2017 (2) dt.15-03-2018 2/2 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this application in order to raise all the points available to them at the stage of framing of charge.

Leave is granted. The application is disposed of. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- U T