Patna High CourtCWJC/8428/2014disposed

Arbind Pandit v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-11Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8428 of 2014 ====================================================== Arbind Pandit son of Late Rameshwar Pandit resident of village - Ballo Chak, P.O. Bhagwanpur Chak Shekho Via - Dalsinghsarai, P.S. Dalsinghsarai, District - Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

3. The Joint Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

4. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

5. The District Education Officer, Samastipur

6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Sarairanjan, District - Samastipur

7. The Headmaster Upgraded Middle School, Ahmadpur, Sarairanjan, District - Samastipur

8. The District Programme Officer ( Establishment ), Samastipur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kr Sharan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2016 The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 23.9.2013, contained in memo no. 4774 passed by the DEO, Samastipur (respondent no.5) dismissing him from service on the ground that he has obtained his training certificate from Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Hindi Sanskrit Vidyapeeth, Bihar which is a non existent institution.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact name of the institution is Dr. Ambedkar Hindi Sanskrit Vidyapeeth, Jokiya, Begusarai, Bihar, however by mistake, the certificate format was wrongly printed in the name of Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Hindi

Patna High Court CWJC No.8428 of 2014 (2) dt.11-02-2016 2/2 Sanskrit Vidyapeeth, Bihar. The petitioner further submits that his case may be disposed of in terms of order dated 7.12.2015, passed in C.W.J.C.Nos. 6740 and 7148 of 2013, which is similarly situated.

Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection to the submissions of the petitioner, provided his case stands on similar footing.

Having heard the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 7.12.2015, passed in C.W.J.C.Nos. 6740 and 7148 of 2013 Shashi.

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) U