Taslim Ansari @ Tasli v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27850 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1233 Year-2015 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

TASLIM ANSARI @ TASLI Son of Hasan Ansari Resident of VillageDinbandhi (Jahda) Ward No.10, P.S-Balua Bazar, District-Supaul. 2.

Samim Ansari @ Samim, Son of Taslim Ansari Resident of VillageDinbandhi (Jahda) Ward No.10, P.S-Balua Bazar, District-Supaul. 3.

Sabir Ansari @ Md. Sabir, Son of Taslim Ansari Resident of VillageDinbandhi (Jahda) Ward No.10, P.S-Balua Bazar, District-Supaul. 4.

Saddam Ansari @ Saddam, Son of Taslim Ansari Resident of VillageDinbandhi (Jahda) Ward No.10, P.S-Balua Bazar, District-Supaul. 5.

Jainab Khatoon @ Bibi Jainab, Wife of Taslim Ansari Resident of VillageDinbandhi (Jahda) Ward No.10, P.S-Balua Bazar, District-Supaul. 6.

Rabina Khatoon Wife of Rahamtullah Resident of Village-Dinbandhi (Jahda) Ward No.10, P.S-Balua Bazar, District-Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar 2.

Bibi Nazmun Khatoon, Wife of Hasmat Ansari, D/o Jainuddin Ansari, Resident of Village-Chhitahi Hanuman Nagar, P.S-Bhaptiyahi, DistrictSupaul. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1233C of 2015 for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27850 of 2019(6) dt.17-07-2019 2/2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, are innocent and have not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioners happen to be in-laws of the complainant and they reside separately and have not concern with the conjugal life of the complainant and her husband. Neither the petitioners have demanded any dowry not they have tortured and assaulted the complainant in any manner. Hence, the petitioners may be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner in the event of surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No. 1233-C of 2015 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T