Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26957 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-715 Year-2021 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Amit Kumar, S/o Sidhnath Singh Resident of Village - Musepur Karauna, P.S. - Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Saket Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2022 Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s) be removed within four weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No.13/2021 arising out of Jehanabad (Karauna O.P.) P.S. Case No.715/2021 instituted under Sections 8/20(B)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

As per the allegation in the FIR, the police upon information that co-accused Amit Kumar is selling 'Ganja', raided his house and apprehended three persons. They included Amit Kumar, Gangadhar Pandey and Deepak Pandey. It has further been alleged that from Amit Kumar (the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26957 of 2022(2) dt.22-08-2022 2/2 herein) 37 KG 950 Grams 'Ganja', one mobile and cash of Rs.5000/- were recovered/seized, from Gangadhar Pandey 3 Kg. 970 Grams of 'Ganja' was recovered/seized while from Deepak Pandey 2 Kg. 20 Grams of 'Ganja' was recovered/seized. It is further alleged that a polythene was thrown by one Sanjit Kumar which contained 70 Grams of 'Ganja', which was also recovered/seized.

Taking into account the quantity of 'Ganja' (37 KG 950 Grams), this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioner herein, for the present, which is accordingly rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T