Vikash Kumar @ Bhim v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25626 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Bhim S/o- Sri Adya Singh, R/o Village- Raghopur, PSRanitalab, Dist- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Special Excise Case No. 739 of 2025, arising out of Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, dated 08.03.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 132, 262, 263, 324(4)(5), 352, and 351(2)(3) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. and under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, 10 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the back of the shop of the co-accused Arun Tanti and 30 litres of country made liquor was recovered from the house of the co-accused Kariman Manjhi.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25626 of 2025(2) dt.29-04-2025 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 09.03.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Special Excise Case No. 739 of 2025, arising out of Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T