Shiv Pujan Kumar @ Shiv Pujan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25335 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Saharsa ====================================================== Shiv Pujan Kumar @ Shiv Pujan Sah S/O Chandar Sah @ Ram Chandra Sah Resident of Ward no. 9, Nariyar, Tola Latha, Nagar Nigam, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad, Sr. Advocate Ms. Sakshi Deep, Advocate Mr.Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 9 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 341(1) of B.N.S. and Sections 66, 66(C) of Information Technology Act.

3. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 08.02.2025.

4. Allegation against petitioner is to cheat the customers, who opened account in his C.S.P. Branch of North Bihar Gramin Bank, running on rent in the building of one Ganesh Sah.

5. Mr. Krishna Prasad, learned senior counsel while

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25335 of 2025(3) dt.29-07-2025 2/3 appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted as some monetary disputes took place between Ganesh Sah, who is the landlord of the petitioner, where C.S.P. branch was operational, the present false implication was made. It is submitted that no other complaint was received from any person against petitioner, where various Aadhar Cards and passbooks belongs to different customers, as alleged to recovered was actual in connection of their bank transactions. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is already completed, for which chargesheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence and, moreover, petitioner found involved in one more criminal case of different nature, where he is on bail.

6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as the alleged documents prima facie appears to be recovered in connection with business transactions of C.S.P. branch, coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already submitted, where petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2025, accordingly, petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 9 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25335 of 2025(3) dt.29-07-2025 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C./Section 480(3) of BNSS.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T