← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4783/2007disposed

Chhaya Kumari @ Chhaya Bhaskar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-18Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4783 of 2007 ====================================================== Chhaya Kumari @ Chhaya Bhaskar W/o Sri Vidya Bhaskar, resident of village Ujjan, P.O. Ujjan, P.S. Manigachchi, District Darbhanga, .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna,

2. The Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar Darbhanga through its Vice Chancellor,

3. The Vice Chancellor, L.N.M.U., Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga,

4. The Registraar, L.N.M.U., Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga,

5. The Principal, M.L.S.M. College, Town P.S. & P.O. Darbhanga, District Darbhanga, through the L.N.M.U.,

6. Mr. Ramdeo Jha,

7. Mrs. Madhuri Srivastava,

8. Mrs. Bibha Jha, All Lecturers in Political Science, in M.L.S.M. Collelge, Darbhanga, P.O. and District Darbhanga, .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha and Dr.Mayanand Jha, Advocates For the State : Ms Divya Verma, AC to AAG 3 For LNMU:

Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 18-07-2016 Heard the parties.

Petitioner wants disposal of this case in terms of the order dated 05.12.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12056 of 2014 a copy of which has been produced at the time of hearing. Let it be taken in the record.

There is no opposition to the aforesaid prayer. Accordingly, this application is also disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move before Justice S.B. Sinha Commission on the dispute whether the petitioner can be

Patna High Court CWJC No.4783 of 2007 (7) dt.18-07-2016 accommodated in the subject of Political Science in M.L.S.M. College, Darbhanga, a constituent unit of L.N. Mithila University. However, it is made clear that this Court has not formed or expressed any opinion with respect to the merit of this case. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U