Lagandeo Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39037 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2017 Thana -BHAGWANPUR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. Lagandeo Mahto, son of late Maujilal Mahto, resident of village- Sahta, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 11-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.120 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 143, 447, 341, 323, 308, 379, 504, 506 Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant with iron rod causing injury in his right index finger. Injury report of the informant is annexed as Aannexre-3 and 3/1, wherein, the doctor has found simple injury on his person. After X-ray, no bony injury was found by the doctor. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39037 of 2017 (3) dt.11-09-2017 2/2 No.120 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T