Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30828/2024dismissed

Vikky Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-21Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30828 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2019 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== Vikky Rai Son of Murli Rai Resident of village- Chilahari, P.S.- Dumraon (Naya Bhojpur O.P.), District- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyapal Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of bail. Earlier his application was rejected vide order dated 22.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 63389 of 2022.

3. The following order was passed on 22.05.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 63389 of 2022:- "Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S. Tr. No. 24 of 2022 / 280 of 2022 arising of Simri P.S. Case No. 204 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The deceased is the wife of the petitioner and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30828 of 2024(2) dt.21-06-2024 2/2 her dead body was found by the police. For the disappearance of the deceased the petitioner did not inform the police. The father of the deceased had given information to the police about the disappearance of the deceased. The conduct of the petitioner shows that he is involved in the killing of the deceased.

In view of the facts and circumstances, as mentioned above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial."

4. No ground for review of my earlier order is made out. It is accordingly dismissed.

5. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T