Nigar Sultana v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7325 of 2022 ====================================================== Nigar Sultana Wife of Late Alimuddin Ahmad, Resident of Mirshika Toli Shershah Road, P.S.-Alamganj, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

3.

The Station House Officer, Pirbahore Police Station, Patna. 4.

The Investigation Officer of Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 430 of 2019, Pirbahore Police Station, Patna.

5.

The State Bank of India through the Branch Manager, Mahendru Branch, Patna, Bihar.

6.

The Banking Ombudsman, B O Patna, Reserve Bank of India. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Fazle Karim, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. N.H. Khan, (SC1) Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Advocate Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 22-06-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "i. For holding that the respondent no. 5 has illegally hold the amount of Rs.40,000/- in the Joint account of the petitioner and her husband (since deceased).

ii. For directing the respondents no. 2 to 4 to investigate the case bearing Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 430 of 2019.

iii. For directing the compensation of Rs. 50 lacs to the petitioner from the respondent no. 5. iv. For holding that the rejection of

Patna High Court CWJC No.7325 of 2022(2) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 complaint of the husband of the petitioner by the respondent no. 6 is arbitrary and a illegal.

v. For any other appropriate relief or reliefs to which the petitioner may be deemed entitled." After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner shall be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and to take recourse to such other alternate remedies which are equally efficacious in law.

Prayer allowed.

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/DKS U