Baijnath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6069 of 2023 ====================================================== Baijnath Yadav Son of Late Halakhori Yadav @ Halakhori Gop Resident of Village- Madaripur, P.S.- Khiri More, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar .
2.
The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate/Collector, Patna, District- Patna. 4.
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna, District- Patna. 5.
The Superintendent of Police, West Patna, District- Patna. 6.
The Sub-Divisional Office, Paliganj, District- Patna. 7.
The Sub-Divisional Police Office, Paliganj, District- Patna. 8.
The Circle Officer, Paliganj, District- Patna. 9.
The S.H.O. Khiri More Police Station, District- Patna 10.
The Treasury Officer, Patna, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (SC 8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs this Court that the grievance of the petitioner, as prayed for in the present writ petition, has been redressed, however, he is aggrieved for non-payment of due interest on account of delay in making payment of retiral dues from the date he became entitled for receiving the retiral benefits under different heads, in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner
Patna High Court CWJC No.6069 of 2023(5) dt.26-09-2023 2/2 seeks to file a detail representation before the concerned respondent to make payment of the interest, in accordance with law.
3. Considering the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner, the concerned respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner and ensure to make payment of interest from the date the petitioner is entitled, in accordance with law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Kerala V. M.Padmanabhan Nair reported in (1985) 1 SCC 429 and D.D.Tewari V. Uttar Haryana Bijli reported in (2014) 8 SCC 894.
4. With the above observation/direction, the present writ petition is disposed of (Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U