Pranjal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24260 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2019 Thana- BARURAJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== PRANJAL KUMAR Son of Ramadhar Singh Resident of Village-Pratap Patti, P.S.-Sahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State through video conferencing. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code ND 25(1-B), A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, on secret information at about 3.35 p.m. on 17.11.2019 the raid was conducted by informant along with police party. In the meantime, petitioner along with one co-accused Manoj Kumar were arrested on the spot. One loaded country made pistol has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24260 of 2020(2) dt.23-09-2020 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2019.

Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in Baruraj Police Station Case No. 234 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail-bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence of witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) SONALI/- U