Sadanand Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4810 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2017 Thana- BARHARA District- Purnia ====================================================== Sadanand Das, Son of Dhodhay Das, Resident of Village- Mulkiya, P.S.- Barhara, District- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in Barhara P.S. Case No. 79 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 452,326,307,506 of the IPC.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he caused injury on the throat of the informant with sharp weapon. The case diary has been received, wherein, injury report is available. Doctor has found injury to be simple on the person of injured. The discharge report is enclosed with the injury report, wherein, it is mentioned that conservative treatment was given to the patient.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4810 of 2018(4) dt.20-03-2018 2/2 weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 79 of 2017 to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateVI, Purnea, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioner and

(3) if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T