Urmila Devi @ Nirmala Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24824 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2018 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
Urmila Devi @ Nirmala Devi Wife of Sewak Das Resident of Village - Panapur, P.S.- Aurai, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.
2.
Sewak Das Son of Parikshan Das Resident of Village - Panapur, P.S.- Aurai, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar 2.
Rashmi Devi wife of Ravi Kumar Resident of village- Panapur P.O- Panapur P.S- Aurai , District- Muzaffarpur at present D/o Upendar Das Village+ P.OMorsand P.S- Runnisaidpur, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bauye Jee Jha (B.J. Jha) For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 17-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case no. (C) 156/2018 registered under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners, who happen to be parents-in-law of the complainant are said to have tormented the complainant over dowry demand and drove her out of her marital house over the said demand.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24824 of 2019(2) dt.17-04-2019 2/2 petitioners that the petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case merely because they happen to be parents of the husband of the complainant. They are living separately from the complainant and her husband and have no concern with their affairs. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus. They have no criminal antecedent.
On the other hand, learned APP opposed the bail prayer of the petitioners.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Sadar Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case no. (C) 156/2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T